Published on: 15-May 05:24am
Alan, I agree that you have to blaze your own trail and do it by testing, testing, and testing to see what really works (and sometimes only in your niche.)
I AM INTERESTED in your techniques (and love your video's answering most relevant questions) and have been following you journey of how you are ranking in YouTube with interest.
I know how to dominate in Google, they show you everyday in the SERPS what they are looking for, just reverse engineer the top 20 results, it's just data and math.
I am a systems guy, a data-scientist, and I believe in a lot of ways YouTube is similar to Google ranking (just less Google dancing) :
I believe, based on my tests, that it should be easier to work the YT Algo with new videos (due to freshness) that have channel topical authority and are between 4-16 minutes long, have provided transcripts, closed captioning, and have broad keyword relationship with the topic in video title, and tags, and mid-length descriptions with the keyword in the first 100 words.
However, I have found that after four weeks YouTube starts to look at user experience (views, watch time on videos, likes, dislikes, subscriptions) audience topical groups with related co-occurrence keyword specific click-through rate more.
The older the video gets, the more YouTube looks at watch data (keyword-specific watch time, collaborative embedding on third-party authoritative sites, ctr daily view velocity, topical co-occurrence of what videos viewers also watch in the same session,.)
I am always open to following those, like yourself Alan, who have experimented and come up with a repeatable process that can help ourselves or our clients get online success.
I am interested and look forward to hopefully a dialog as more of the group try some of your techniques.
Looking for anything specific article which resides in general queries? Just browse the various relevant folders and categories and then you will find the desired article.
Contact Us